| Scream (1996) Dir: Wes Craven Cast: Neve Campbell, Skeet Ulrich, Matthew Lillard, Rose McGowan, Courteney Cox, David Arquette, Jamie Kennedy, Drew Barrymore, Liev Schreiber Rated R, Approx: 111 Minutes Dimension Films DVD |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| "Don't Answer The Phone. Don't Open The Door. Don't Try To Escape." |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Craven's 'comeback' film is little more than an obvious self-referential thriller disguised as a slasher film. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| How this came to be known as a deconstructuralist masterpiece, I'll never understand. For some reason the majority of film goers seemed to think that poking fun at the 80s slasher cliches was something new. Not only had it been done before, it had been done much better before - Sleepaway Camp 2 and Popcorn were far more enjoyable homages...shit, even Saturday the 14th and Student Bodies had some redeeming values! Even more astounding is the fact that the once great Wes Craven was behind the camera. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Examining the codes that serve as a basis for many contemporary horror films sounds like a fun idea. With Craven at the helm though, this comes off as nothing more than self indulgent drek. Scream has no sense of compatibility with the films that it's trying to parody, instead it places itself on a pedestal as it play like the be all and end all of slasher films. It's trying to put down horror movies while at the same time distancing itself from them. The 'in jokes' are easily some of the stupidest lines I've ever heard in a movie. These resulted in legions of know it all smart-asses running around with the remarkable knowledge that Dee Wallace Stone was in ET and The Howling and most importantly that Jason wasn't the killer in the original Friday the 13th. Worst of all is the spill over audience for the classic, Halloween. Where exactly were all these fans the year before? If Craven hadn't driven his point home enough at this point, he sticks in a line about all the A Nightmare on Elm Street sequels suckling (I know he claims this was in Kevin Williamson's script beforehand, but I just don't believe that...or if it was, I bet he loved it). I wonder why there was no mention of his own sequel to The Hills Have Eyes? Honestly, if Craven thinks so little of the genre that made him what he is then he should leave and try not to let the door hit his ass on the way out. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| The story itself concerns a group of hip young kids who pass the days partying and exchanging witty banter. Throw in a mysterious killer, a Scooby-Doo like ending and that's pretty much it. The lowlights include Jamie Kennedy as the movie expert and Matthew Lillard at his most annoying. Kennedy spends the movie running around spouting off the 'rules' of a horror movie. His extensive knowledge though, sounds as if his genre research was based on the tepid horror selection of a Blockbuster Video. Lillard is just about unbearable, delivering some of the worst lines in the worst manner. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Craven: Same old act. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| I find it funny that Craven so readily disowns the horror genre here as if he's matured as a filmmaker...yet he refuses to grow up. He's trying to direct teen movies in his late 50s and hide behind a deconstructuralist concept. All he really succeeded in doing was creating a showcase for the pretty faces of the WB type stars and infesting the genre with a wave of self referential smart ass teeny bopper slashers (most of which involved Kevin Williamson in one way or another). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Technically, I have to concede that Craven knows what he's doing. This movie is not ineptly filmed. As far as compliments go, that's all I can muster for this one though. I'll take the tragic Mari Collingwood over Sidney Prescott any day. While Mari was interesting not only as a character but as multi-layered symbol of innocence and youthful experimentation; Sidney is an embarrassingly one dimensional introverted brat. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| As I look for what exactly about this movie rubs me the wrong way so much, I find it important to note that it is not the overall slickness of the direction that bothers me. I would not expect Craven to have kept the raw power of Last House on the Left or The Hills Have Eyes throughout his career. I understand that people evolve as artists, but this is no excuse for this mess. Take George A. Romero for instance - his career spans from Night of the Living Dead to Jack's Wife to The Dark Half to Bruiser. Granted he hasn't hit the bullseye with every film, but his films are none the less always compelling and thought provoking. The savage feel of NOTLD is nowhere to be found in the recent slickly produced Bruiser but he never sinks to the level of insulting the genre and directing feature length Party of Five episodes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| In the end, we are left with a remarkably influential film that I despise. Craven spends nearly two hours knocking the derivative nature of the horror film but somehow never finds the time to admit that Scream in pretty derivative in its own right. The infamous opening sequence is blatant in stealing shots almost directly from Mario Bava's 'The Telephone' segment of the classic Black Sabbath. The end is even worse, almost a completely shameless knockoff of Happy Birthday to Me! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| This is a movie that I feel very strongly about, but I've also run into many genre fans that I respect very much that like this movie a lot. As cranky as I seem with this review, I would like to stress the idea that it is not intended as a personal slam to anyone who likes the movie. I do not consider anyone 'less' of a horror fan for liking it...perhaps they see something in it that I'm missing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 washed up director out of 5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| review: Dr. Spector 2/27/02 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
