| Cemetery Man (1994) Dir: Michele Soavi Cast: Rupert Everett, Anna Falchi, François Hadji-Lazaro, Mickey Knox Rated R, Approx: 100 Minutes Medusa DVD (Region 2), Anchor Bay DVD (Region 1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
aka
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| One of the finest, most underrated film of all time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| I have to admit, I've been procrastinating in writing this review for some time now - due mainly to intimidation. How am I supposed to summarize my feelings on such a multi-layered film that I hold so close to my heart in a brief review? Another part of me was arguing that it was a crime to have a site dedicated to the genre I love without including my feelings on my favorite film of all time. So, in the end I've come to a compromise: I will do my best to scratch the surface of this dense and beautiful film here and promise to myself, and anyone else who might be interested in reading it, a more in depth theoretical critique to appear in the 'Writings and Rants' section of this site. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Now that I've got that little disclaimer, I'll get to the movie. Dellamorte Dellamore is the fourth feature film to be directed by Michele Soavi. Soavi has worked with such genre names as Dario Argento, Lamberto Bava, Lucio Fulci, and Joe D'Amato in various positions in his career. Soavi's past features were all quite impressive, but Dellamorte Dellamore is the first film to realize his full potential. Attaining a separate identity from one's predecessors is never an easy task when they've made some of the most influential and stylish films in the history of the medium (just ask Lamberto Bava!). His first two features (Stage Fright and The Church) were both strong efforts to be sure, but were marred by close stylistic similarities to the work of those before him. With 1990's The Sect, Soavi began to explore slightly different thematic territory while maintaining his identity as an Italian genre director. He took this even further with Dellamorte Dellamore. Not to put down other Eurohorror though, this is an area of film for which not many other subgenres even come close. I do not want to alienate Soavi's masterpiece from such flawless works as Black Sabbath, Suspiria, or The Beyond. This film in no way puts itself on a pedestal as being better than other works, although I realize that I sound as if I myself am sometimes doing so when attempting to convey my admiration for this particular film. To sum it up briefly, this film still works comfortably within the subgenre but also warrants individual analysis on it's own merits (as do many other films from Italy). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
The film's original Italian title translates into: Of Death, of Love. Since it is generally regarded by distributors that American audiences are dullards, we get the retarded title Cemetery Man. On it's own the title sounds kind of interesting in a comic book sort of way, but it lacks the poetic value of the film itself. The literal translation gives you a much better idea as to what you should expect. We get a film that flirts rather liberally with both existentialism and determinism in dealing with a cemetery watchman's exploits involving his introspective views of life (and of course, love and death are the most common modes of expression). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| The main character is the aforementioned watchman, Francesco Dellamorte (St. Francis of Death). He is surrounded in every way by death. Burying death no longer does the trick, since in the Bufalora Cemetery the dead rise from their grave 7 days after they first pass on. He is forced to put an end to them with his assistant and only real companion in the world, Gnagi ('On his ID card it reads - distinguishable characteristics, all') by splitting their skulls. Generally they shoot them but a spade will do the trick as well. His only connection to the outside world is through another government employee, Franco. Franco is the only person Francesco tells about the cemetery problem (he says that 'It's easier just to shoot them' when he is confronted by all the paperwork it requires to report this sort of thing). Franco maintains a stronger facade of social conscious than his friend but in the end is equally as disillusioned. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| When he tires of the outside world and his dreary existence in the dead community Francesco is confronted by a beautiful vision of life in the form of a young widow. He immediately sparks to life, lying about his educational background in hopes of impressing her. In the end it is his world of death that wins her over in the form of an old ossuary. From here the two begin an intense affair that is interrupted by the return of the woman's dead husband. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| The inescapable destiny of death looms over our characters (and the viewer). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| I'll refrain here from turning this into a scene by scene summary of the film. An in depth analysis of such a complex title deserves more room than alloted it a simple review. Suffice it to say though that Francesco continues to struggle to come to terms with his own existence and take control of his fate. The films dialogues range from scathing social criticisms to philosophical debates discussing the indifferent nature of death ('the whore'). Gnagi plays off of Francesco beautifully, offering an excellent comparison between 'intelligence' and contentment. Eventually the leads have to decide whether or not they want to live their entire lives under the veil of death, or take control of their own fates. No matter what the outcome though, death is inescapable as ever and always looms over their (our) heads. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| To reiterate one last time, the above paragraph is a gross oversimplifying of the films broader themes. Part of what makes this movie so great though, is the sheer ambiguity left in its wake. I would never be arrogant enough to say that my explanation of the events in the film are the be all and end all. There is so much room for interpretation here that I feel this film will endure as a timeless classic. If you haven't seen this yet, I probably sound like a pretentious blow hard by this point. Let me assure you though, Soavi avoids such dangerous pitfalls that are so common with movies of this depth. Never does he get caught up in himself and come across as conceited. Throughout all the headache inducing philosophical undertones of the film is a well told, fun story. He throws in just enough slapstick comedy and fantastic gore scenes that he's sure not to alienate fans of his macabre roots. All of the jokes hit the mark for me here, I haven't laughed as much since Peter Jackson blew up a sheep with a rocket launcher in Bad Taste. Soavi so masterfully balances the madcap fun with the dense philosophical and political themes that almost everyone save the most prudish should be able to find something to enjoy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
This film is as technically well realized as it is aesthetically. As I already said, Soavi proves to be a master of his craft. The film moves along with poetic fluidity thanks not only to Soavi's superb direction but also Mauro Marchetti's fantastic cinematography (he also served as assistant camera on Four Flies on Grey Velvet and Apocalypse Now) and Manuel DeSica's (Vittorio's son) haunting score. The film is also aided by some truly unforgettable performances. Standouts include Rupert Everett turning in a flawless performance as the introspective title character and French musician Francois Hadji-Lazaro as his mute assistant (injecting a great deal of life into his character with very limited dialogue - gnah!). To be completely honest though, everyone involved does an excellent job and deserves a special mention, not the least of which being Anna Falchi in her breathtakingly gorgeous performance in multiple roles. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| The releasing of this film is indeed the most disappointing aspect. This has become quite a cult hit, I figured it would of injected fresh blood in the slowing crop of top notch Eurohorror. Instead Fox has pretty much let this one fester on video shelves, never releasing it at a sell through price or on DVD. I was lucky enough to see this print on the big screen in Boston over this past summer, this is truly an awesome experience. On a positive note, the film was able to obtain an R rating with no cuts whatsoever (a lot of sites will try to sell you on an uncut version, don't believe it...the only thing different is the title). Not that the US version is the definitive one by any stretch. This is a movie that should be seen widescreen at any cost. There are a few DVDs released internationally that I know of. The best of which to get would be the one from the fine folks at Medusa. This one features a stunning anamorphic transfer, great sound, and some interesting extras (that are unfortunately in Italian only). A word of warning though, there is a slight confusion regarding the running time. The package lists it as 108 min but it is still the standard 100 min cut. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 zombie boyscouts out of 5! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| review by Dr. Spector 3/20/02 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
